InterNICHE

InterNicheとは
ニュース
代替法
良心的拒否
リソース
あなたにできること
日本の動き
サイトマップ
リンク
HOME

 

 

 


InterNICHE連絡先

本部
InterNICHE Co-ordinator

Nick Jukes
42 South Knighton Road
Leicester LE2 3LP
England
Tel/Fax +44 116 2109652
coordinator@interniche.org

 

 

良心的拒否 

 Introduction
 Advice for students on conscientious objection
 Student Testimonies
 Supporting texts and example submissions

Introduction

Many students from the life sciences have deeply held beliefs and valid feelings regarding the use of animals in practical courses. Where humane alternatives are already the norm or where official student choice policies exist, respect has already been granted, and the situation is conducive to good learning. In some universities, however, such students are discriminated against and their freedom of conscience violated. While a few may drop out or be forced to change discipline, others are encouraged or coerced into performing dissection and other animal experiments. Conscientious objection is the only option left within such an environment.

The number of students who conscientiously object and publicly disagree with harmful animal use is often low. This is understandable considering the social and academic pressures of being a student, and the psychological and academic penalty often threatened to those who question the status quo. But the situation is misleading, and the literature shows that when the inherent ethical issues surrounding animal use are discussed openly, many more students will object and ask for alternatives. Occasionally whole classes may object, giving teachers the opportunity to exercise their academic freedom and develop new and progressive ways to meet the teaching objectives.

Conscientiously objecting students have usually thought about the issues in a determined and critical way, and researched the literature on knowledge and skills acquisition. Some have written comprehensive proposals to their university, and have arranged extra-curricular training, for example with private veterinarians. They aspire to best practice. In other words, as well as the high level of motivation and commitment to their education, they are prepared to challenge the orthodoxy if it can't be sustained, and to use the rigour of critical thought whilst never losing the heart that must inform even the most objective of decisions. They comprise some of the best scientists, individuals who will continue to help shape the future long after graduation.

Healthy emotions and clear minds are needed when new proposals and challenges are made; dialogue and mutual respect are needed too, because a win-win solution benefiting the student and the institute can usually be found from a perceived conflict. The role that conscientiously objecting students play in this process is often one of bringing in new ideas and new energy. They could be welcomed as partners with the teaching establishment in helping to modernise and make humane the current practice, and recognised as catalysts for the resolution of existing and often unspoken tension. It is up to teachers to respond appropriately.

The evidence of a ground-shift is becoming more and more apparent: the new veterinary college at Western University of Health Sciences in California, now closer to opening its doors to students, has all its courses being designed to be zero-animal consumptive, with a 'reverence for life' philosophy. Its director of surgery and clinical studies, Dr Lara Rasmussen, is herself a former conscientious objector, and she was head-hunted for the post. So there is already a new generation of revolutionary teachers, using in their courses a wide range of alternative tools and approaches consciously chosen for a top-quality education, and with full rights granted to both students and animals.


up

Advice on conscientious objection

Some courses within biological science, veterinary and human medicine still involve the harmful use of animals. You may not have anticipated that such animal use would be part of your degree, and if you realise now that there is a tension between your personal ethics and the expectations of some of your teachers, then use this guide to conscientious objection to help find a creative solution. It is based on the experience of other students who have been in the same position as you. Securing humane alternatives to harmful animal use is not always easy, but there is a growing number of teachers who recognise students' rights to freedom of conscience and who are aware that high quality 'alternatives' are already the norm in many institutes.

1. Find out the exact situation
Choose an active role. Don't rely on being told. Talk to your tutor or course leader as early as you can. Find out whether animals are used in the course you have chosen. Ask what species of animals are used, how many and for what purpose. Ask if there is a policy of student choice. Are alternatives provided, and if so, what are they?

2. Decide where you stand. Examine your motives. Know yourself.
According to your own personal ethics, where exactly do you draw the line with respect to animal use? Be able to defend your position. Decide what is an acceptable alternative. Certainly you require a relevant and educationally-valid alternative practical, with equivalent time, effort, learning quality and academic credit - after all, you are paying for your education and you came to university to learn. You can succeed on your own, but there can be great strength in numbers. Ask around to discover which other students feel the same as you. Gain the support of friends, and of other teachers if they are sympathetic. Read the student testimonies on this site to appreciate the possible actions and reactions of all stakeholders. Contact InterNICHE at any time you want practical advice and support. Get a realistic feeling of how far you are willing to go in order to stand up for what you believe: if a co-operative solution to the problem can't be reached then it may be necessary to adopt a more challenging approach.

3. Approach your teacher
Calmly but firmly explain to your teacher that the practice of using animals conflicts with your ethical, moral or spiritual beliefs. You want to learn the course material, but not by harming an animal. Specifically ask for a good alternative, as you intend not to participate in the animal practical and would like to reach a mutually agreeable solution to the problem. Don't let the teacher intimidate you: you are justified in your feelings and views. But don't be self-righteous or confrontational, and be prepared to discuss the issue. Anticipate what you might be asked. If your teacher is open to change and you are told that you can use an alternative that is acceptable to you, then ask for this in writing.

If the response is non-committal, ask for an answer. If it is negative then you need to present your case in greater depth. It is wise to keep a written record as you go through the process. Include action you have taken, meeting dates and times, the people involved, subjects of conversation and statements or decisions made. Keep copies of written communication and all relevant printed material. Do this now.

4. Research more information
Understand the concept and practice of humane education, and be aware of similar courses in other universities or countries which allow student choice and offer alternatives, or do not use animals at all. Contact InterNICHE for support. Familiarise yourself with the range of alternative methods that are available and the issues around their use such as teaching potential, cost and quality, and what equipment, if any, is needed. Use the resources and background information available on this site, and order some of our other material. Read up about alternatives and their educational validity, and consider borrowing and familiarising yourself with some of the best products, available through our Alternatives Loan System. Find out in detail the teaching objectives of the practical. You could also design a proposal for replacing the animal practical with a combination of alternatives suitable for meeting the teaching objectives, or write a fuller submission arguing your case.

Find out what formal procedures there may be for resolving difficulties at the university. Ask a supportive member of staff or your InterNICHE national contact for details about staff-student boards, ethics or review committees, and the opportunities for formal exemption from animal use. Consider demanding the implementation of an official student choice policy. Gain the backing of the Students Union and the welfare officer. Understand any national or international legislation that can support your position. Begin the process now.

5. Submit your case
Present to your teacher an information pack which includes your position and requests, your proposal for replacing the animal practical with full details of suitable alternatives, and all relevant literature. Consider including a copy of the InterNICHE video Alternatives in Education, the forthcoming book From Guinea Pig to Computer Mouse, and details of the InterNICHE Alternatives Loan System. Request a written response from your teacher. Copy the material to the head of department, the dean, and your supporters, explaining the situation fully. If your requests are met, well done! Ask for confirmation in writing.

6. Use pressure
If the response is still negative then you need to apply pressure. Meet with your supporters for further discussion. Visit the head of department and the dean. Begin formal procedures such as applications to university review committees, if you have not already done so, and appeal to the relevant bodies at national level if your rights are still denied. Inform national civil liberties organisations of your situation, and keep in close contact with InterNICHE. Make the problem public: use your student newspaper and local and national press. Launch a petition, or call for a deluge of faxes and e-mails to the university from around the world. Arrange speakers and organise a debate on animal use, alternatives and students' rights. If the pressure brings a positive change, congratulations! Ask for confirmation in writing.

7. Consider legal action
If the university still refuses to respect your rights, and you are prepared to continue, then there is the option of a legal challenge. It is possible to take your university to court, and several students in Germany and the USA have indeed won in such cases. Others have lost. Consider carefully the time, money and energy needed for such action.



Support is always available from InterNICHE. Please keep the network informed of your progress - your experience could help other students in the same situation.

Read the Student Testimonies to see how other students have dealt with the challenge of demanding alternatives, and use the supporting texts and submissions.



up

Student Testimonies

 Angela Ewing NESCOT College Epsom, & Westminster College, London, England - Clinical Science & Medical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1995 - 1998

 Anya Feddersen University of Karlsruhe, Germany - Teacher Training (Biology and German Philology), 1987-98

 Denise Humphreys University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales - Zoology, 1991-94

 David Karatson Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary - Biological Science and Geography, 1983-1989

 Andrew Knight Murdoch University, Perth, Australia - Veterinary Medical Science, 1997 - present

 Morton Larsen University of Odense & University of Roskilde, Denmark - Biological Science, 1993 - present

 Elena Maroueva Moscow State Veterinary Academy, Russia - Veterinary Medical Science, 1995・000

 Siri Martinsen Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo - Veterinary Medical Science, 1996 - present

 Makiko Nakano Azabu University, Sagamihara City, Japan - Student Testimony Veterinary Medical Science, 1994-2000

 Jörg Ostendorp University of Bochum & University of Osnabruck, Germany - Biological Science, 1994 - present

 Jo Powell Portland Community College, Oregon, USA - Human Anatomy and Physiology, 1997 - present

 Linnaea Stull University of Illinois, USA - Veterinary Medicine, 1998 - present

 Thales Tréz Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil, and Leuven University, Belgium - Biological science 1995・999; Applied Ethics 2000 - 2001

 Birgit Vollm University of Frankfurt and University of Witten / Herdecke, Germany - Medical Science, 1986-96 (interrupted)


up




 

InterNicheとは リソース サイトマップ
ニュース あなたにできること リンク
代替法 日本の動き HOME
良心的拒否    
o